I have found Xemacs to be rock solid on Debian. I've run it on Potato, Woody, and Sid. When something has gone wrong, it's usually been another package. And I strongly suspect that most of those bug reports refer to old versions. Maybe this means there's a problem with the bug reporting system (I'm not in a position to say), but not with Xemacs.
In short, go ahead and use Xemacs. Dan -- _______________________________ /\ \ \_| Dan Griswold | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | __________________________|_ \_/____________________________/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
