I notice that "woody" installs a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4 kernel. Are the reasons behind that decision?
I'm hoping to start shipping a product that has Debian installed on it in a couple months, and hopefully the "stable" release of 3.0 will be out by then. Is the plan to have "stable" 3.0 run a 2.2 kernel? There's nothing particularly wrong with the 2.2 kernel, but I'm starting to see reports of device drivers that run under 2.4 but not 2.2, and one of the device drivers I maintain has features under 2.4 that aren't available under 2.2. I'm planning on building a custom-tailored 2.4.x kernel-image package for above-mentioned product, but I'm wondering if I should also include a similarly configured 2.2 kernel-image... -- Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
