On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:22:38PM +0100, kellyh wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:18:15PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > I uninstalled pretty much everything from potato - and left just a
> > > skeleton system for the upgrade.  Apt-get -f dist-upgrade and then
> > > waited.  After downloading apt freaked out (I can't remember at which
> > > point), so I used dselect to see if that could sort it out.  It wanted
> > > to download another 40MB, for a complete upgrade I guess.  Fine, so I
> > > waited some more.  Now it's done it is having difficulty with
> > > configuring debconf:
> > > 
> > > Setting up debconf (1.1.14) ...
> > > no type given for question at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Question.pm line
> > > 15.
> > > dpkg: error processing debconf (--configure):
> > >  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255
> > > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > >  debconf
> > > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> > > 
> > > And obviously loads of important stuff ain't getting done.
> > > How do I get out of this one?
> > 
> > OK,  Not bad.  You need to install many basic packages before getting
> > debconf running.
> > 
> > # cd /var/cache/apt/archives
> > # dpkg -i libc<TAB><RET>
> > # dpkg -i perl*<RET>
> > # dpkg -i apt*<RET>
> > # dpkg -i debconf*<RET>
> > # apt-get -f upgrade
> 
> Hello, I did this and libc* perl* apt* are all installed and configured,
> but it still won't configure debconf...
> 
> Setting up debconf (1.1.4) ...
> no type given for question at /usr/share/perl15/Debconf/Question.pm line
> 15.
> dpkg: error processing debconf (--install):
>  subprocess post-installlation script returned error exit status 255

Mmm.  So I formatted (well, what can I say), reinstalled Potato, changed
sources.list to unstable, apt-get update and then apt-get apt dpkg
debconf, and I've got the same problem.  Can you upgrade from Potato to
Sid?  When is Woody coming out? :)

Harvey


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to