On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Weissgerber, Tom L wrote: > The following information should not have been made available to the > entire public domain. Please remove the following links/files at your > earliest convenience. > > * Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:57:42 -0700 > * Message-id: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04351.html> >
> * In-reply-to: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04351.html> > > * Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04364.html> > > * Old-return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * References: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/09/msg04351.html> > > * Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:carla%40bratgrrl.com> While requesting the deletion of your original (2003!?) post might be a reasonable request[1], asking to delete another person's post without their approval is definitely *not* OK. The fact that it is a response to your post (to a very public forum) is irrelevant. To your credit, at least it was a polite request and not a demand with implied Legal Attack-Dog Powers(TM). I am afraid that the request is going to generate a much larger trail than if it had been just left alone... [1] Looking at the bigger picture, I would hope (and assume) that this request is denied/ignored by the list managers. Cutting material out of historical archives leaves me with an uneasy feeling at the best of times--very bad precedent. Never mind the zillion archive copies floating around... -- Brad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
