On Wednesday 11 January 2006 08:30 pm, loos wrote: > Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 17:16 -0500, Michael Marsh escreveu: > > On 1/11/06, Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But you definitely have to come up with some soft of working > > > implementation, be it hard- or software, I agree. > > > > Actually, that requirement was dropped awhile ago. You only have to > > roughly describe an implementation. There are actually a lot of > > patents that have been issued for "inventions" that won't work. The > > USPTO specifically disallows patents on alleged perpetual motion > > machines, but has been known in recent years to grant patents on > > perpetual motion machines masquerading under different names. > > "Zero-point energy" is a particularly popular one.
But Zero-point energy works. I know it does. I saw Colonel Carter working with a zero-point module on Stargate SG1. Hal