-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" > field in the address headers?
http://www.google.com/search?q=munge+reply-to http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to > the originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All > other - non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field > and it enables one to concentrate on the message, rather than the > postman:-) Competent MUAs (like Mutt/elm and Evolution) have a Reply-to-List command. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEmUUfS9HxQb37XmcRArpBAJ9OXuIbBOu7ROcSUCxhwDdc+eBjGwCfZGsL YkBJlKi4oi6FgAq3Gfu8K/w= =qb1G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
