Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 13:55 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook a écrit :
If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in
the address headers?
A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the
originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All other -
non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field and it enables
one to concentrate on the message, rather than the postman:-)
Peter HB
I suppose the reason is:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Interesting document, but somewhat religious in tone. If I Reply to All
the original poster will probably receive 2 copies of the reply, unless
I take the time to edit the headers (although Reply to All will have the
benefit of ensuring that non-registered users of a list will receive a
reply).
Thanks for pointing out the useful reference - I probably deserved a
RTFM. A quiet think is in order.
Regards
Peter HB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
