Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 11:50 -0500, Mike McCarty a écrit : > Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > > If it's not an FAQ, why doesn't this list use the "Reply-to" field in > > the address headers? > > It's not a FAQ, it's a FFF (Frequent Flame Fest) around here.[...]
Well, an argument gets faster when you rehearse it often enough. > > A couple of times recently I've hit Reply and sent a response to the > > originator, rather than the list - for which I apologise. All other - > > non-Debian - lists to which I subscribe use this field and it enables > > one to concentrate on the message, rather than the postman:-) > > I finally just decided "Screw 'Em". I hit Reply-To-All and let the > Debianistas receive two copies. You will of course note that the "Debianistas" can point the Reply-To header to the list themselves if they feel so inclined. T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
