Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The catch here is that you have no idea of what the spamtrap address is. I > dont think it is easy for humans to guess what the spamtrap addresses look > like.
I suspect that spammers know a lot more about that than you or I. Or maybe they don't, and simply do it _randomly_. Anyway, the point is that simplistic assumptions like "if it arrives at a spamtrap, it must be spam" are just that -- simplistic. Spamcop ought to have measures in place to deal with the inevitable cases where their assumptions turn out to be wrong. Unfortunately many anti-spam sites, in their zeal to attack spam, seem to not care very much about what collateral damage they inflict. -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]