On 15-okt-2006, at 3:49, Ron Johnson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/06 15:37, Peter Teunissen wrote:
On 14-okt-2006, at 22:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/06 15:01, Peter Teunissen wrote:
On 14-okt-2006, at 17:49, DRCNet wrote:
Dear friend:
[snip]
I never realized Dogberts Ruling Class was pushing drug
legalization!
Let the induhviduals have their drugs, as long as it turns them
into
efficient working drones... :-)
Alert, alert! There's an induhvidual lurking in our midst
pretending to be a member of the D*N*RC.
Quick, get the torches and pitchforks!!.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
I stand corrected, bow my head in shame and will unsubscibe from the
DNRC.... Although I doubt a true member of the DNRC would use a
_working
class_ item like a pitchfork to defend his position instead of his
wit
and mind.... ;-)
Working class? There's something *wrong* with needing to work for a
living?
Now that you mention it, it _is_ strange that we tend to call only
the class of people working with their hands 'working'. As if working
by using your mind would be a sort of laziness.
But to answer your question; yes, there's something wrong with having
to work for a living. The man that invented 'work' should be shot,
even if that means digging up the sucker. Personally I love money. I
love it to be on my bankaccount so I can spent it and have others to
do my bidding. Not having to work for money, means you can spent you
life doing usefull stuff, things that make sense to you in stead of
you boss. But you may freely prefer to have it any other way.
;-)
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
