Thank you for the answer Ron. Marcelo
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 16:27 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/02/06 15:05, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > I am running sarge, and I am going to compile a program which is not in > > sarge but in testing. I have downloaded the source file together with > > the *.diff file from the ftp.debian.org site. I have installed all the > > required *-dev dependences (the sarge version of them) too. I would like > > to learn about the steps in order to make a deb package of the program, > > in particular, how to deal with the *.diff file. Where can I find a > > "compiling programs in debian way for dummies" reference? > > > > Thanks in advance for the help > > $ wajig show debian-builder > Package: debian-builder > Priority: optional > Section: admin > Installed-Size: 136 > Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Architecture: all > Version: 1.6 > Depends: perl, perl-modules, build-essential, devscripts, dpkg-dev > Filename: pool/main/d/debian-builder/debian-builder_1.6_all.deb > Size: 14750 > MD5sum: 25acd919751fefcb8a9918a56f7bc2df > SHA1: 51b55615948a01a9a22b46e6be4e3c2e52f30b14 > SHA256: 2e58957cc7e769a32065597a865030cad0f59eb44b6f7c17afa9cb233c81668f > Description: Rebuild Debian packages from source code > This is a simple tool which is designed to allow a local > administrator to rebuild individual Debian packages from > their source code. > . > With the aid of a few included wrapper scripts this allows > automatically rebuilding a package and all its dependencies. > . > Note: This software is not designed to enhance your installation > by producing optimized binaries, however this may be achieved > with the aid of companion packages such as 'pentium-builder', > or 'athlon-builder'. > . > The prime purpose of this package is to ease the testing of > compiler patches such as the Stack Smashing Protection patch > available from IBM. > Tag: suite::debian > > > - -- > Ron Johnson, Jr. > Jefferson LA USA > > Is "common sense" really valid? > For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that > whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins > are mud people. > However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFFSnC0S9HxQb37XmcRApSvAJwNuBg1YnQw83vkaRVOgSdtT1B6ngCdGQZ2 > JKiiCMaX5Ptyg52K/xu98Z4= > =5PF2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Marcelo Chiapparini [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
