On Sunday 31 December 2006 21:13, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 18:30 +0100, Nigel Henry wrote: > > On Sunday 31 December 2006 18:17, Nigel Henry wrote: > > > On Sunday 31 December 2006 16:42, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 16:30 +0100, Mathias Brodala wrote: > > > > > Hello Marcelo. > > > > > > > > > > Marcelo Chiapparini, 31.12.2006 16:27: > > > > > > thank you for your answer! My sources.list file has the Marillat > > > > > > repository: > > > > > > > > > > > > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ sarge main > > > > > > > > > > > > Now the output from aptitude: > > > > > > > > > > Did you run „aptitude update“ before this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, Mathias > > > > > > > > Mathias, > > > > > > > > I run update periodically. However, I ran aptitude update again now, > > > > and I got the same result as before: Couldn't find any package whose > > > > name or description matched "gstreamer0.8-lame"... > > > > > > > > are you running sarge? > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Marcelo > > > > > > Out of interest I've just added Marillats repo to my Etch install. I > > > don't use aptitude, but apt-get, and synaptic. There is a > > > gstreamer-lame there, but it is version gstreamer0.10-lame, which is > > > the same version as all the other gstreamer stuff on the list. > > > > > > Nigel. > > > > Apologies for replying to myself, but further down synaptics list is > > gstreamer0.8-lame. > > > > I know I'm not in Sarge at the moment, so can't check out if it's > > available there. It may be worth checking that you have no typo > > in /etc/apt/sources.list for the Marillat repo, and that the key is > > installed ok. > > Hello Nigel, thank you for reply. No, I have no typos > in /etc/apt/sources.list for the Marillat repo... I don't know about the > key... by the way, does exist a list of all the software in Marillat > repository? > > Thanks! > > Marcelo
I've just emailed Christian Marillat to see if there is a list of available packages. I know for third party repo's for Fedora core, there is normally a list of available packages, and you can download individual packages with no problem. Of course there may be dependency issues that, if you downloaded the packages with apt-get, dependencies would be resolved by apt-get, but might find yourself in dependency hell otherwise. Just wait and see if I get a reply from him. Nigel.
