-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Allen wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: > >> I think we've been through the whole iceweasel == || != firefox issue >> before. I understand the reasoning behind the name change, and I >> understand both sides of the issue. What I don't understand is why it >> has to have such a large impact on us, the users. > > Probably because some packages, and the Mozilla Suite and derivatives > are a good example, are updated frequently upstream. > > For packages like this, I always use the upstream package, rather than > Debian ones. Most people that do this, don't have these issues, in my > experience. > > It's nice to use only Debian packages, but in some cases it's just not > practical IMO.
I can see the wisdom in that. Thanks for the tip. I always use Debian packages, except for my video driver. I think I will have to add my Firefox to that list as well. I'd prefer a QT based version of it, but alas, I don't know of one that exists. If I am not mistaken, there is a version of Swiftfox available as a package, but I don't know if that is in sync with Firefox or not. Google time. Joe - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGAW1MiXBCVWpc5J4RAuYLAJ9Zb9dIoTVPhE8QtaxuL8rMc/9sfgCgvTKs 0sd9CuQxEFv+JUIgVWU0C+Q= =lnm3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
