-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joe Hart wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 19:50 +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
>>> Rick Thomas wrote:
>>>> On Apr 14, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:21:56PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>>>>> Anybody know what the problem is here?  Or how to fix it?
>>>>>> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
>>>>>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
>>>>>> not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
>>>>>> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>>>>> You need to import the public key for volatile.debian.org separately
>>>>> using
>>>>> apt-key if you want to use this repo with secure apt, the key is not
>>>>> included in the default debian-archive-keyring package.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Two questions:
>>>>
>>>> 1) How do I import the public key for volatile?  (If it's in the fine
>>>> manual, then please point me to it so I can RTFM)
>>>>
>>>> 2) What's the reasoning behind not including it in the default
>>>> debian-archive-keyring package?  Is it not recommended that everyone use
>>>> volatile for the things like security and spam updates that it provides?
>>> 1) Rick, read the message Kushal Kumaran sent to you.  It tells you.
>>>
>>> 2) That is a good question.  I have no idea.  Oversight perhaps?  I am
>>> sure if it wasn't there is a good reason for it, but I have no idea what
>>> it could be.
>> Let me ask you this Joe.
> 
>> Would you have the key for Debian-Multimedia in the "Debian Archive
>> Keyring"?
> 
> No, but I might make it a little easier for Debian newbies to find it in
> the first place.  Something like a simple script that people could use
> to install the missing multimedia applications/codecs that almost
> everyone wants.  Those who don't want them of course wouldn't need or
> want to use such a script, but having one available and make it plain
> that it was available would stop a lot of people bitching about Debian
> not coming with them in the first place.
> 
> Somehow I think this issue has been beaten to death already, but it was
> before my time.  I understand the legal issues involved, but they don't
> apply where I live, at least not yet.
> 
>> Being a Debian associated, but not really an Official Debian repository.
>> The same goes for volatile. Until they become FULL ON FRIENDSHIP Debian
>> repositories, I don't think it'll get into the "debian-archive-keyring"
> 
> Point well taken.  I agree with on this one.  I said I didn't know why,
                                 ^you
> now I do.  Personally I don't use that repo, so I don't know that much
> about it.  Thank you for informing me.
> 
> Joe
> 
I need to learn to proofread my mail before I hit the send key.  How can
I miss putting the word you in the above (where I corrected it)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGITUliXBCVWpc5J4RAtBfAJ4rPA5vfZjJofPr/nzwy0k2ygOovACfeSuy
C3iBslaz0JrOButbx97WfRw=
=6QFF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to