-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Joe Hart wrote: >> Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:37:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >>>> ~$ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 >>>> linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: >>>> Installed: 2.6.20-3 >>>> Candidate: 2.6.20-3 >>>> Version table: >>>> *** 2.6.20-3 0 >>>> 500 http://ftp.ro.debian.org sid/main Packages >>>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status >>>> >>>> Strange thing is that linux-image-2.6-686 doesn't depend on it so I had >>>> to select it specificaly. >>> I wondered why all these people have been talking about 2.6.20 stuff >>> when my up-to-date sid is still at .18. >>> >>> Is that a bug of l-i-2.6-*? >>> >> Andrew, see my other message. It boils down to: I need 2.6.21 because >> it fixes a timing issue that affects this computer. >> > > that doesn't answer my question: > > Is it a bug of l-i-2.6-* that it doesn't depend on the latest kernel > (i.e. 2.6.20-3). AIUI, that package should always depends on the > latest 2.6 kernel, but apparently, it doesn't > > A
I agree with you. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGRWX+iXBCVWpc5J4RAjF9AKDHWRvkRMrSaMtQmduYIUbTJvBApACguzDp g99jJrTdKHTBM4sBGDvbLUI= =9hGJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]