Sáb, 2007-08-25 às 12:46 +0700, Ms Linuz escreveu: > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/default.mspx
Microsoft simply trying to cheat. Okay $2,499 maybe a little, but when they say "Free" they are trying to include Linux itself and not only Red Hat to be the Target but specially Linux. But to be a true TCO, and comparison Microsoft should had do de comparison between their operating system and all Linux distributions to be a 100% true comparison, in the price to the software, and include the price of support. Okay, but when to kick Microsoft ass? But the big mistake well, if we go to https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/server/ Red Hat tells: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Platform (Unlimited sockets) Well Unlimited sockets it's the number of cpu's, but if we read the EULA of Microsoft operating systems they're licensed under a number of cpu's, if you want more you need to pay more to Microsoft. Well now to Reliability, or may I say in the way of Microsoft, HOLES? Well Easy configuration and management, okay it's just click next, next, next in buttons and everything works just fine, but when we need a customization? How I can do? Click next? and follow the instructions? Well no way dude. Interoperability Open Standards ≠ Open Source Well it's easy to implement Open Standards in Open Source, then the OpenXML implemented by Microsoft in Office 2007 tries to be a Open Standard for Documents, when the Open Source Open Document Format, it's a Open Standard. And to use Open XML from Microsoft we will need some closed source components made by Microsoft, so what this means? Well Microsoft just trying to create a Open Standard using closed programs in this way they're preventing the evolution of Open Standards as a true Open Standard. So my conclusion.... Don't believe in what you read from Microsoft it's just trash lies... Sincelery José Paulo Matafome Oleiro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
