On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:28:13 -0500, Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote: > As I said, it might be a good starting place. If the patching of the > source is done right, it's dependent upon a define anyway. I don't > have high hopes for that. All the patches I have submitted for inclusion in Debian have been conditional -- as is the case in patches accepted upstream that I am aware of > "Unpatching" is not difficult, as there are > diff tools which can do that automatically if one has the original > source. Providing that back to Gentoo, along with a polite request, > might get access to original source. > If, as you say, the changes are "small", then pulling the unmodified > sources for those things which are changed for SELinux should not be > difficult. Since one is going to build from source anyway, then the > rest is a shoe in. > I'm not so sure the changes are "small". > If Gentoo is not amenable, then there's SLAX, which I believe does not > have SELinux. Well, best of luck in searching for a distribution that meets your goals. manoj -- He'll sit here and he'll say, "Do this! Do that!" And nothing will happen. Harry S. Truman, on presidential power Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]