H.S. wrote: > Russell L. Harris wrote: > > >>>> Maybe Br-script isn't "real" postscript, I really don't know. > >>>> > >>> If the printer is a "real" Postscript machine, it is specified > >>> in CUPS as "raw", and you don't need foomatic. > >> > >> Just tried the raw printer - looks like it is real. Thanks for pointing > >> that out. > >> > > > > It likely is the case that "Br-script" differs from genuine Postscript > > sufficiently to avoid a copyright infringement suit and thus, to avoid > > the necessity on the part of Brother to pay Adobe for a Postscript > > license. > > > > > > Here is something interesting: > http://solutions.brother.com/Library/sol/printer/color/26_34_pc_color_pcl_vs_ps.html > > Brother calls their BR-script driver as postscript driver. > > ->HS
OK, now I'm wondering what the differences are between genuine Postscript and BR-script.....and if those differences may cause trouble later on. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
