On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:54:37 -0500 "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote: > > > Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been > > using the second nic because it wasn't needed. However, now I > > want to host 2 different SSL hosts using named virtual hosts. > > So, I need a second IP and I'm dipping into my range of IP > > numbers. > > If they truely are on the same physical pice of wire, why not use > virtual/aliases. Eg, instead of eth0 and eth1, you would have eth0 > and eth0:1 or something (never done it, check the man pages). > > Doug. > Don't I end up doing the same thing? I thought of aliasing eth0, but why? I have a nic not being used in the machine and running another wire from my switch to it will give me what I need. If I alias eth0 to eth0:1 I'd still need to assign eth0:1 another IP number. Right? -- Raquel ============================================================ The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice. --Martin Luther King, Jr. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
