-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:19:15AM -0500, Hose wrote: >> On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Alex Samad wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote: > [snip] >>> some reason that xfs is not being talked about? >> You know I'm not sure. I vaguely recall xfs being really bad with >> unclean unmounts (moreso than most other filesystems) and it's >> performance has not kept up with the newer stuff, but I probably should >> look into again (unless someone says NO IS HORRIBLE!!!!!). >> >> I actually use it personally on a few external drives, but nothing >> extensive. > I have started to use it for holding large files avi etc, it seems to be > a lot faster when manipulating these files, deletes etc. > > But i do have a ups attached to the machine >> hose perhaps i should switch my downloads partition over. Rich -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIFsAHLeTfO4yBSAcRAqHaAJ94yeKRfqRW6Lg0LvBlm2I+HaCPHACgiufs 0gc/LrsSJmjvhXZbcAl3E2U= =sZkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]