On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:02 +0000, Hendrik Boom wrote: > I've noticed that some 40K byte jpeg files are very good, as good as ones > ten times the size, and that others are awful. The question naturally > arises about the proper way to further compress the large images to save > disk space. > > What image compression programs have people found to give good results? > > And to what extent is good image quality the result of the algorithms > that display the image, adjusting image size to screen size and > resolution and the like?
isn't it image dependent? It is for GIFs and so I thought for JPEGs too... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
