On 06/25/2008 05:48 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 Jun 25 02:20 -0500]:
This is a retrograde development. A principal advantage of Linux has
always been that you had a wide choice, but this restricts choice. It
seems that I must either use CUPS, which I don't want to do, or print to
file and then print that.
I guess I don't understand the reluctance to use CUPS. Once I switched
to it a few years ago, many printing issues I had were solved.
Granted, it's another daemon running, but, IMO, worth it.
- Nate >>
CUPS is complicated bloatware that a user of a directly-connected
printer *shouldn't* need.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
