On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:19:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> One of the many faults I find with mutt is its IMAP implementation. In
> two words, it fails. Copying individual messages from the current folder to
> any other folder, especially trash, by downloading the message and then
> uploading it back to the server over the IMAP connection instead of issuing an
> IMAP copy operation is horribly slow and inefficient.
I use mutt regularly with secure imap on my home network. I handle quite a
large number of emails. I also use a Macbook with imap to the same
server on the same network and I must say I prefer mutt to the very
good Macbook Mail-program. Sometime I even prefer mutt on the
macbook. My experience is not that it is 'horribly slow and
inefficient'. Are you sure that it is not a network-related slowness?
To use mutt with more than one imap-account, just create a different
mutt-configuration file for each one.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a
shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the
trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught
up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord
in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord."
I Thessalonians 4:16,17
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
