On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:34:09PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote: > Not really answering your question directly, but may I suggest, if cost > is not *absolutely* critical, that you consider RAID 10? If it is a > server, then certainly you will want to get away from a three-drive RAID > 5. A RAID 10 is a good compromise between redundancy, speed, and cost. > It just takes four drives instead of three (or two.)
Is there an advantage of software raid10 over multiple raid1 arrays joined with LVM? Capacity can be dynamically added with pairs of disks. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
