On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:15:56PM -0400, stan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:47:49AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:01:47PM -0400, stan wrote: > > > Is sound still also broken in testing? > > > > [Please don't send me private copies of list mail. I read the list.] > > Sorry, my mailer insists on sending mail back to the originator. I thinks > it's because of the way the mailheaders come from the list :-( > O catually have to explictly cc the list to get it sent there.
Set 'subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in ~/.muttrc, then use 'L' rather than 'r' to reply to list mail. Also, you can always edit headers in mutt before sending the mail. > > I don't know the problem you're referring to, so I have no idea ... > > smokey:~# apt-get upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following packages have been kept back > aspell aspell-en audacity avifile-mad-plugin avifile-mjpeg-plugin > avifile-player avifile-vorbis-plugin avifile-win32-plugin > avifile-xvid-plugin avview black-box bubblemon criticalmass debconf > freeciv-gtk gcompris gcompris-data gcompris-sound-en gedit glunarclock > gnome-applets gnome-mud gnome-panel gnome-panel-data gnome-session > gnome-spell gnome-utils gnumeric gnumeric-python initrd-tools j2re1.3 > libguppi16 libgwrapguile1 libopenal0 libsdl-mixer1.2 mc mp3blaster > mplayer-k6 mysql-navigator pan penguin-command rockdodger sidplay-base > simplecdrx soundtracker sox timidity tuxpaint vegastrike vorbis-tools > wenglish xchat-common xine-ui xmms-modplug xmms-osd-plugin xmms-qbble > xmms-sid xpenguins-applet 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, > 0 to remove and 58 not upgraded. > smokey:~# libvorbis0/libvorbis0a, probably. Guess so then. > > > And a followup question, if I want to install a new system, what should I > > > do, just install stable, and accept that it will not be nearly as current > > > as my machines which have been tracking testing for a while? > > > > That depends what you're looking for. My server runs stable; my laptop > > (which is also my main development machine) runs unstable; my > > workstation at work ran stable up until late last week, and now runs > > testing because I wanted mozilla-firebird with anti-aliased fonts. > > How did you get it upgraded to testing, given all teh current breakeage in > testing? That clearly depends on what packages one has installed, doesn't it? As a work machine it has relatively little in the way of sound, flashy desktop environments, etc. The upgrade was flawless with the one exception of having to mess around with XKB a bit to get my Alt and Windows keys swapped over again the way I like them. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]