On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Sarunas Burdulis <[email protected]> wrote: > *.ps files are source code of an interpreted language Postscript. > Usually they contain quite a bit of definitions, fonts etc. before pages > themselves are described. In general PS files can't be just concatenated > and still expected to make sense for the interpreter. The way to join PS > files should incorporate a Postscript interpreter. Ghostscript perhaps?.
Yes, thanks for tip but if you look at my message, which is started the tread, you may see: MG>"Since googled first, I've tried: $ gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pswrite -sOutputFile=program.ps part1.ps part2.ps part3.ps But resulted document is x10 in size and looks like a rasterized one. There are serious paper format mismatches also. Do not fit my needs, anyway." 'gs' is a Ghostscript interpreter. Actually, I am really surprised with that situation. I know, PS is a language. And as I have expected from a "language", it have to be fully structured and formalized, because it supposed to be 'rendered' or 'interpreted'. Technically, I do not understand what the problem is to append the text pages to each other. Few hours ago I was pretty sure that task may be resolved with a single google ride. :( -- С Уважением, Марк Гольдштейн Sincerely Yours' Mark Goldshtein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
