On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:31:00AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <20090526142918.gc5...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote: > >On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:17:16PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >> In <20090525163904.gb5...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote: > >> >On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >> >> In <20090524145214.ga16...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote: > >> >> >I > >> >> >don't want to run an akonadi server either, whatever that is. > >> >> Oh, then you don't want to run those parts of KDE; They require a > >> >> connection to an Akonadi server. They've been scheduled to since > >> >> before KDE 4.0 was available. > >> >Maybe not. I'd be fine without them, if it would work without --- but > >> >it doesn't. > >> I said it before, and I'll say it again: That is just not true. I was > >> careful in my package selection and I have a working KDE 4.2 (including > >> my must-have kmail) and I do not have a mysql server installed. > >> > >> KDE 4.2 can work without Akonadi, with a minimum of fuss. > >It is true, just a matter of fact. > > No, it is not. > > Your statement: KDE 4.2 doesn't work without the parts that want an Akonadi > server.
I've never said that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
