On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:57:09PM +0200, Suno Ano wrote: > > Matthew> Unison is the "more complicated than necessary" option here. > Matthew> If all that is needed is backup, unison is not the best > Matthew> choice. > > true, but then having a backup without a clearly defined restore > scenario does not make a lot of sense. Once Unison is up and running > that part can be considered done as well.
Likewise for any "rsync+hardlinks" solution (like rdiff-backup). Except that you get an incremental backup. Hence it's easier to have more than one copy. Restore? cp -a . Or your favorite file manager. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [email protected] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [email protected] | | best ICQ# 16849754 | | friend -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
