On 2009-07-20 09:19, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-07-20 14:52 +0200, David Fox wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Ron Johnson<[email protected]> wrote:
But why the opposite, like lib64bz2-1.0 in the i386 repository?
Maybe just for the converse reason, running amd64 binaries on a mostly
32-bit userland setup. I guess this would work with a 32-bit kernel.
Not a chance, a 64-bit kernel is required to run any 64-bit binary.
So if you're running a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userland, it would
theoretically be useful. But there's no "bzip2-64" in the i386 repos.
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
