Eric Meijer wrote: > Emanoil Kotsev wrote: >> Thanks Eric >> >> I was also thinking to use the boost package. I don't like it's heavy and >> my app would depend on it too. >> >> > As mentioned by Roger Leigh, you only really "pay" for what you are using. > Why are you worried by the dependence on boost? > What I like about it is that boost really is the place where new > libraries for upcoming C++ standards are developed are tested. As a > result boost is really widely used, well regarded in the C++ community, > and consequently high quality. It is also likely that C++ threads will > look a lot like the boost implementation when they arrive in the standard. >> So there is no easy way around pthreads from C++ except boost? >> > As suggested by Roger, you could use the pthreads directly. I prefer > the C++ interface from boost. > >
Agreed. I'm just not that familiar to C++. I like objects and I'm wondering how threads are implemented that's all. :-) I didn't expect it being this way honestly. I understand one good approach would be libboost. Thanks for that and kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
