On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:26 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 10:00:11 Brian Nelson wrote: > > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 18:42, Chris<[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> web browser: Firefox (Not IceWeasel)
> > > am curious: what's wrong with Iceweasel?
> > It fails to work in some cases where Firefox does work, due to it
> > reporting a different User-Agent string.
> I fail to see how that is the fault of Iceweasel.
That naturally is not Iceweasels fault. But it still means that Firefox
has a significant advantage over Iceweasel because it actually works on
a plethora of - admittedly crappy - websites.
You might want want to have a look at the discussion on -devel
about that.
kind regards
Wolodja
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
