-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388 > > "Based on all testing done for this benchmark essay, XFS appears to be the > most appropriate filesystem to install on a file server for home or > small-business needs : > > * It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s) > * It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount > * It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB) > * This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large number of > small to moderate-size files and directories > * It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory > listing or file search > * It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system ressources > is quite acceptable for older generation hardware"
That benchmark/article is from 2006 though, and the references are from 2003 and 2006. The hard disks are PATA and slow (100 and 133). Are there any newer benchmarks? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkuVbDcACgkQ+VSRxYk440/HuACgxH+ViIaFb4J3ZfOGupFbLr0x 5nMAniDoeCvK34si/wr6wqUc3z8KRUpb =YEVd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b956c37.8080...@web.de