On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Camaleón <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:45:36 +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote: > >> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Camaleón wrote: > >>> Oh, no, but... If W3C does not trust "Flash" technology to be included >>> as one of their recommended standards, why should I? That is the point. >> >> Linux, FreeBSD, OSX and other OSs included in that W3C standards? I >> think the answer is no... Do you have trust in them? > > "Linux, FreeBSD, OSX and other OSs" all of them include their own > licencing model, whatever it is (closed or open sourced), so I can use > the software knowing beforehand what I can (or can't) do with it.
You've talked about W3C recommended standards and not about licenses. > Do not get me wrong, I'm only saying that if I were a developer, I would > have many doubts in choosing a flash format for any of my works. Developers never forced to use Flash/SWF or any other standards. If you have any doubts in SWF just use other format. Bye, a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
