On Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:11:49 am Neil Brown wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:36:23 -0500 > > Mike Viau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:15:14 +1100 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > This looks wrong. mdadm should be looking for the container as listed > > > in mdadm.conf and it should find a matching uuid on sda and sdb, but > > > it doesn't. > > > > > > Can you: > > > > > > mdadm -E /dev/sda /dev/sdb ; cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf > > > > > > so I can compare the uuids? > > > > Sure. > > > > # definitions of existing MD arrays ( So you don't have to scroll down :P > > ) > > > > > > ARRAY metadata=imsm UUID=084b969a:0808f5b8:6c784fb7:62659383 > > > > ARRAY /dev/md/OneTB-RAID1-PV > > container=084b969a:0808f5b8:6c784fb7:62659383 member=0 > > UUID=ae4a1598:72267ed7:3b34867b:9c56497a > > .... > > > UUID : 084b969a:0808f5b8:6c784fb7:62659383 > > [OneTB-RAID1-PV]: > > UUID : ae4a1598:72267ed7:3b34867b:9c56497a > > .... > > > # definitions of existing MD arrays > > ARRAY metadata=imsm UUID=084b969a:0808f5b8:6c784fb7:62659383 > > ARRAY /dev/md/OneTB-RAID1-PV > > container=084b969a:0808f5b8:6c784fb7:62659383 member=0 > > UUID=ae4a1598:72267ed7:3b34867b:9c56497a > > Yes, the uuids are definitely all correct. > This really should work. I just tested a similar config and it worked > exactly as exported. > Weird. > > Whatever version of mdadm are you running??? > Can you try getting the latest (3.1.4) from > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/raid/mdadm/ > > and see how that works. > Just > make > ./mdadm -Asvv > > NeilBrown Hi, I am just starting to use RAID on my systems and it was suggested that I make sure my drives were set to raid by:---- "fdisk -l" This should say that the relavent drives are set to "raid auto-detect". Gerald
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
