MRH <misiek_s...@o2.pl> writes: >On 23/01/11 04:53, Cameron Hutchison wrote: >> and I had to revert two commits to fix it: >> >> 7b8ea53d7f1865cd8f05dfb8f706a4ff5a72abcf (makefile: not need to >> regenerate kernel.release file when make kernelrelease) >> >> 01ab17887f4cdcb8bb5a5d1bc3b160d186e6e99b (Makefile: "make kernelrelease" >> should show the correct full kernel version)
>I'm afraid it's a bit beyond my skills at the moment - I guess it's >about getting source tree by svn and reverting the changes applied by >getting previous version of a file? You need to have the git kernel tree, and you use the "git revert" command. The second commit to revert (01ab1788) has a conflict when reverting, but that's pretty easy to resolve (if you know what you're doing :-)) >Thanks anyway - I hope it will start working for me at some point :) I haven't had time to look into what the correct fix would be, but I may have some time in the next few weeks. I'll put it on my todo list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3d34.4d3f5ba2.3d...@getafix.xdna.net