2011/3/12 John Hasler <jhas...@debian.org>: > darkestkhan writes: >> ...I don't see a reason why should I do dist-upgrade, after all I'm >> running sid constantly... > > Because the sort of inter-release changes dist-upgrade is intended to > handle can happen in Sid at any time. >
I'm running sid / experimental so dist-upgrade in my case is almost like throwing away half of the system; And I'm using aptitude safe-upgrade which is good solution. Also frequent ( I'm doing upgrade at least 2 times a day ) upgrades are really sorting out most of inter-release changes that may ( or may not ) happen in Sid. Also packages in Sid or experimental can have unsatisfied dependencies. > Osamu writes: >These are not bad idea but not that essential. > >You have to have a rescue media or another relatively new content >partition which you can use to boot your system after you broke it with >upgrade. Dual boot + Rescue GRUB disk is something I always use to save >my recovery time. > >Osamu For entire year ( I started using GNU/Linux year ago and from the beginning I was using sid / experimnetal ) of running sid / experimental I never had to recover my system. darkestkhan ------------------------------------------ jid: darkestk...@gmail.com May The Source be with You. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinJtXUvW6Lca5EhkKNM+L8CZJWEVN-km5h6CD=s...@mail.gmail.com
