On Sunday 03 April 2011 18:20:37 Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:33:04 +0100, Lisi wrote: > > On Sunday 03 April 2011 16:52:14 Camaleón wrote: > > (...) > > >> And also the reverse, from "Dozy" try to ping "Tux" (ping -c 3 > >> 192.168.0.2). > > > > Wow! Could you explain how you knew that? I might recognise it myself > > another time!! > > I've just read that you finally put all the pieces of the puzzle in the > right order by yourself :-) > > I noticed something wrong when Shawn cleverly asked you for the result of > "ip addr" command. There you can see the real IPs for the machines: > > - Tux was 192.168.0.2 > - Junior was out (no result from ip adrr) > - Dozy was 192.168.0.33 > > There was no track for "192.168.0.3" nor "192.168.0.8" (the first hosts > you wanted to reach) so the only thing we could do was trying to ping the > hosts with "known" IP addresses and hope the results of that test > provided any additional clue... which finally did.
Thanks yet again, Camaleón! :-) A lucid explanation. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
