Hi,
lee wrote:
Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglas...@affinityvision.com.au> writes:
lee wrote:
That you don't want the problem to exist doesn't help. Look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=+635184 and tell me if
you know a better solution.
100M logfiles via email is way too unreasonable.
Do you have any arguments or a solution?
A 10MB logfile isn't that insignificant, if you need access to larger
log files, then you would be far better off having more direct access
via other means [ssh login perhaps]. The next thing you'll tell me is
that your browser should be able to hold a 100MB logfile in a tab --
that is just crazy!
How are you going to work with a 100MB logfile? Chances are you will
grep for particular things or summarize the logfile via a script of some
kind to make the data useful and of a manageable size.
How long it takes to get to a 100MB logfile is another issue. If you
aren't checking the logfile more regularly (one way or another), getting
hit with a 100MB logfile is going to hurt in other ways.
There is also the idea of using a syslog server that is more easily
accessed where needed.
--
Kind Regards
AndrewM
Andrew McGlashan
Broadband Solutions now including VoIP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2d7a66.8040...@affinityvision.com.au
