That's not how extents work. What you are describing is a large block
granularity, not extents-based allocation. There is no reason why the
next allocation can't happen like this:
[X][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[X][X][X][X][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[X][X][X][X][X][X][X][X][A][A][A][A]
[X][X][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[X][X][X][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-]
[-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-][-]
That was pretty much my question, ty very much :)
greets!
aL
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1e6a84.4040...@qindel.com
