lina <lina.lastn...@gmail.com> writes:
>Yes. the ultimate goal is:
>for i in {0..108}
>do
>cat A_$i.txt B_$i.txt C_$i.txt -o ABC_$i.txt (output as ABC_$i.txt)
>done
>but here I wish to use only 8 processors at most, total is 16.
>the administrator of the cluster asked me not to use whole, cause
>someone else needs SMP server.
seq 0 108 | xargs -I@ -P8 cat A_@.txt B_@.txt C_@.txt -o ABC_@.txt
Most people use the character sequence {} where I have used @. I find @
to be simpler to type, so I use that instead.
I don't think you need -n1 in this case as it is somewhat implied by the
use of -I.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/22a7.4f274fb6.c...@xionine.xdna.net
