On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:28:45 -0500, Tom H wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:18:38 +0000, Brian wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun 05 Feb 2012 at 21:09:26 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:12:26 +0000, Brian wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Your proposal fits the remit of debian-...@lists.debian.org. >>>>> >>>>> Agree. >>>>> >>>>> But first we should know if it's a supported feature and that's why I >>>>> suggested asking first to devels at debian-boot mailing list. >>>> >>>> This is where we came in! >>>> >>>> No need to ask; WPA/WPA2 is known to be available in a Wheezy install. >>>> Booting a debian-testing netinst iso should dispel all doubts. >>> >>> I wonder how did you reach that conclusion given that it has not been >>> published anyhwere... black magic, mind reading? (just kidding) :-) >> >> http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/wpasupplicant-udeb >> >> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot.log >> >> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot.log > > That's not the kind of sources users tend to read (i.e., Debian wiki, > Debian News, debian-devel, debian-boot, Debian planet, Debian blogs...).
I dont' read these either. I just knew that there was a wpasupplicant-udeb (I'm not sure from where) and I pointed to its existence as a package as well as to the fact that it's being included in the installer. In looking at the debian-boot archives, I've found two relevant bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327309 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610931 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sx8k_mo5jcveht+wp1jzu2z-clwagste_ah4+gpk3o...@mail.gmail.com