Camaleón <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:06:40 +0100, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
>> In the latter case, which package should I report against? > I'd say "libsane". I think I'll go for udev. Once the scanner is attached to to a scsi device file, then the appropriate module should be loaded and the files created. >> Some info: >> ~/ % uname -a >> Linux gatsby 3.2.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Sun Feb 5 23:52:49 UTC 2012 i686 >> GNU/Linux >> package "udev" is version 175-3 > You're on sid, right? It is a mixed testing/unstable system. Thanks for your attention. Morten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
