On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:20:08PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > 09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti: > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not > >> You waste our time and bandwidth. > > > > In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures > > are valid. > > > >> Bob's key validates his identity - yours does not. > >> I can verify that "Bob" is "Bob" through a chain of trust. > > > > Why does Mikka's not? It's not impossible for someone to have a trust > > path to Mikka. Albeit one step removed, since the signing key he uses > > has one signature, from another of his keys - but that one has at > > least one. (I haven't managed to construct a trust path to Mikka > > myself, since most of the public pathfinder servers don't have his > > key) > > > > > > Because nobody else near Kotka, Finland uses PGP and the nearest CAcert > assurers are after 110KMs from me. > > PS. I am back to weird long signatures. I won't comment to this thread > anymore nor to anything else which I haven't written in my signature or > elsewhere. >
Bye. -- ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ Indulekha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120509125701.GB11415@radhesyama