On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:07 +0000, Camaleón wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:45:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote: > >> Alternatively, should I just ignore the signature, in which case why is > >> the sender polluting the list with useless crap? > > > > That's the problem. > > (...) > > And what's _what you think_ the problem is? > > The problem here is that users *don't understand* what a GPG/PGP > signature is. > Or some do fake that they are dummies, while they aren't?!
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:16 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:59:34 +0200 > Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Ralf, > > > This resulted in "Valid signature, but cannot verify sender (Phil > > Dobbin <[email protected]>)": > > Because there's no web of trust involving people that both you and the > keyholder know. Exactly and this is valid for the majority on mailing lists. Btw. funny photo. - Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336670333.5199.3.camel@precise
