On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:20, David Palmer. wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 08:19:17 -0400 > Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday October 9 at 11:29am > > Edward Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If you need good 100mbps performance under load, you can't go wrong > > > with Intel. The 3Com 3c905Bs I use in my workstations also seem to > > > take anything I can throw at them (including trying to run Q3A > > > X11/OpenGL over a network, just to see if I could ;). > > > > I picked up a 10 pack of 3Com 905B's on eBay for about $50 USD. I've > > only used a couple so far, but they are my favorite. Work well, every > > time. > > -- > This sounds like the best option so far, unfortunately I'm working > on a 1Ghz Athlon, not intel, and the planned migration is to dual > Opterons when the 64bit smp project matures.
??? What's wrong with the 3c905B? Why shouldn't it work with AMD systems? > Thanks for the input, but it looks like the CNet 200 pros are the > only show happening for Linux. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA Why is cyber-crime not being effectively controlled? What is fuelling the rampancy? * Parental apathy & the public education system http://www.linuxsecurity.com/feature_stories/feature_story- 150.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]