On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:32:11PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >> > Your 200 to 300 Mbps correspond to your disk throughput in my opinion. >> > Try to use iperf to test your network throughput, and be well aware >> > that your disk io will be the real bottleneck here. >> sorry i got your question wrong sorry for my weakenlish >> >> correct me if i am wrong becuase the drives that i baught has default >> 3 GB througput do you still thing >> drives could be the bottleneck here? > > > There are no spinning drives that give 3GB/s throughput. That is the > rating for the SATA interface between the drives and your PCI(e) > bus. > > There are some solid-state disks, very expensive, which can > approach 600MB/s. There are some SSDs that connect directly to > PCIe that approach 6GB/s. In either case, you would have > mentioned them, because they are very very expensive. > > If you have ordinary SATA disks, the best you can expect is > about 120MB/s per disk, which various RAID schemes can add > together with more or less efficiency.
Yes i am using ordinary HDs. still 120MB is way more then what i am getting i am just getting less then 300Mbps about 40MB/s > > -dsr- > > > -- > http://randomstring.org/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. > You can't fight for freedom by taking away rights. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=umpp244a7kxkjzou1_r6tye+wjlh6rfu2og0ecsi...@mail.gmail.com
