Okay, that's the second slipup in the Matrix :-). Why did Mutt and Nano freak out on me?
----- Forwarded message from Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2nd try? fontconfig? autohinter? anyone? Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:40:12 -0700 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:52:59AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Tom wrote: > >Since I didn't get an answer yet, I'll ask again: > > > >(To anyone) Do you prefer fontconfig with the autohinter > >or bytecode interpreter? I'm trying to decide how to > >set it up. > > > >Thanks. > > > > > > Just pick one. If you don't like it you can just > > dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig > > That present you with the various configuration options again (the > same as when you first installed). > > -Roberto Well, then, I'll stick with the decision I made six months ago: the autohinter looks worse than the bytecode interpreter. You know, this is the first slipup in the Matrix I've experienced since I switch to Linux. (I hope you get that: 9 months ago I was a MS-employee. I mean to say: taboo subject about which we are embaressed so we'll pretend it isn't worth discussing... Less than complete intellectual forthrightness... Patent issue we cannot overcome...) Not that it's a big deal, just find the arbitriness curious... Everything else is rational. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- End forwarded message ----- -- The California Recall was like the British Prime Minister election. It was a vote of No Confidence with a short election cycle. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
