On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Camaleón <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:03:12 -0400, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Camaleón <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 06:50:44 -0400, Tom H wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Camaleón <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>> I'm not sure to had get it (sorry, I must be a bit dense...). Can you >>>>> provide a user case for someone using block lists and another case >>>>> when they're not in use? >>>> >>>> I've explained twice (IIRC; I'm replying quite late to this thread >>>> because I've been busy...) and I'm not sure that I'm going to do a >>>> better job a third time but I'll try. >>> >>> Yes, sorry, but what you call "block lists" is what I've been using >>> since many years with no problem. That's why I find strange this is >>> being "demonized" :-? >> >> I'm demonizing them but the grub developers certainly do given the >> message that you get when you install grub to a PBR/VBR. > > Yes, I read about it. But this warning has to be new or at least I don't > recall GRUB legacy showing this notice when you were going to install > GRUB into a partition instead the MBR :-?
"I'm demonizing them" should've been "I'm NOT demonizing them"... I have no idea why the grub developers have decided to label the installation to a PBR a bad thing given that it works just as well (or as badly, depending on your point of view) with grub2 as grub1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=swqokd9o-xv15can0x0wx4cmlc1+y-xvxhmgyhc5id...@mail.gmail.com
