Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:58 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote: > > Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit : > > > I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have > > > a tiny access time? But that their read speed is about the same as a > > > normal disk (also, I might be wrong, but I understand their write speed > > > is average). > > This would have been true some years ago: > > > > Comparison of average sequential reading rates (HDD of 2012 and SSD of > > 2011): > > http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/ssd-charts-2011/AS-SSD-Sequential-Read,2782.html > > http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/hdd-charts-2012/-01-Read-Throughput-Average-h2benchw-3.16,2901.html > > > > Please note that I compared SSD with desktop HDD: mobile HDDs are > > generally slower. > > > > About write speed, the very best HDD gave 164.06MB/s on average while > > *most* SSDs are above 150MB/s and the best reaches a few MB/s less than > > 400. > > Ah, my knowledge was out of date. I'll try and squirrel away that > factoid :) > :) But you comment still holds true: one should not expect a huge increase of performance here as far as hibernation is concerned.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1345811358.16160.2.ca...@p76-nom-gd.cnrs-imn.fr
