-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:15:19AM -0400, Naitik Shah wrote: > I'm trying to shift to mutt full time, and I'm amazed at how little it > sucks (!).
I believe mutt gets both RMS's and ESR's seal of approvals, and they both have so much as said that they dedicate their efforts to "software that which does not suck." > I do have one question though, how do I add people to the > 'To', 'Cc' and 'Bcc' fields from my address book? Since you don't get to see who is in the BCC field, count that one out. > Also, on a side note, I'm using a local IMAP server for a local account > using Maildir, and I was wondering if mutt is strict with Maildir? Why do it this way to begin with, when mutt is easier to deal with working against local spools? - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/jNJnUzgNqloQMwcRAko7AJ0QZJpAmEbYKuy84mVZEGmqSDV7yACgy8KW aRXLro36Yu13suRa6QR9340= =vMAx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
